On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 18:07, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/27/24 09:19, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
This is resend #2 of v5 [0] with some touchups applied.
Changes since v6:
- Drop flawed patch to move some SME/SEV related calls out of the early
boot path to avoid the potential need for backporting patches #6/#7
to kernels where SEV support may not be crucial. This problem will be
dealt with if/when it arises while doing those backports.
Changes since v5:
- drop patches that have been merged
- rebase onto latest tip/x86/boot
- fix comment regarding CR4.PGE wrt flushing of global TLB entries
- avoid adding startup code to .noinstr.text as it triggers objtool
warnings
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240221113506.2565718-18-ardb+git@xxxxxxxxxx/
Cc: Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
For the series, tested bare metal boots with mem_encrypt=on /
mem_encrypt=off and boots of SVM, SEV, SEV-ES and SEV-SNP guests.
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
Thanks a lot! I take it this was a kernel built with GCC?