Re: [RFC] How to test panic handlers, without crashing the kernel

[Guilherme G. Piccoli]

On 05/03/2024 13:52, Jocelyn Falempe wrote:
> [...]
> Or maybe have two lists of panic notifiers, the safe and the destructive 
> list. So in case of fake panic, we can only call the safe notifiers.
> 

I tried something like that:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220427224924.592546-1-gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx/

There were many suggestions, a completely refactor of the idea (panic
lists are not really seen as reliable things).

Given that, I'm not really sure splitting in lists gonna fly; maybe
restricting the test infrastructure to drm_panic plus some paths of
panic would be enough for this debugfs interface, in principle? I mean,
to unblock your work on the drm panic stuff.

Cheers,


Guilherme