Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: qcom: Add camera clock controller driver for SM8150
From: Bryan O'Donoghue
Date: Wed Mar 06 2024 - 08:56:05 EST
On 06/03/2024 08:30, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
Anyway I suspect the right thing to do is to define a
titan_top_gdsc_clk with shared ops to "park" the GDSC clock to 19.2
MHz instead of turning it off.
You can get rid of the hard-coded always-on and indeed represent the
clock in /sysfs - which is preferable IMO to just whacking registers
to keep clocks always-on in probe anyway.
Please try to define the titan_top_gdsc_clk as a shared_ops clock
instead of hard coding to always on.
Defining the gdsc clk allows consumers to control it, we do not want
this clock to be disabled/controlled from consumers. Hence it is better
to not model this clock and just keep it always on from probe.
Not if you mark it critical
static struct clk_branch cam_cc_gdsc_clk = {
.halt_reg = 0xc1e4,
.halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
.clkr = {
.enable_reg = 0xc1e4,
.enable_mask = BIT(0),
.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
.name = "cam_cc_gdsc_clk",
.parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw*[]){
&cam_cc_xo_clk_src.clkr.hw
},
.num_parents = 1,
.flags = CLK_IS_CRITICAL | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
.ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
},
},
};
and then add this to your camss clocks
<&clock_camcc CAM_CC_GDSC_CLK>;
The practice we have of just whacking clocks always-on in the probe() of
the clock driver feels lazy to me, leaving the broken cleanups we have
aside.
As a user of the system I'd rather see correct/complete data in
/sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary
Anyway I'm fine with setting the clock always on, I can always send out
a series to address this bug-bear myself.
So yeah just fix the cleanup and then please feel free to add my
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>