Hi,
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 4:07 AM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,Sorry! I wasn't aware of the previous discussion and nobody had
sorry that I did not see the patch before.
Am 27.02.24 um 23:19 schrieb Douglas Anderson:
Even though the UDL driver converts to RGB565 internally (seeWe had a heated discussion about the emulation of color formats. It was
pixel32_to_be16() in udl_transfer.c), it advertises XRGB8888 for
compatibility. Let's add ARGB8888 to that list.
decided that XRGB8888 is the only format to support; and that's only
because legacy userspace sometimes expects it. Adding other formats to
the list should not be done easily.
brought it up till now. As discussed on #dri-devel IRC, I've posted a
revert:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240306063721.1.I4a32475190334e1fa4eef4700ecd2787a43c94b5@changeid
I guess the one argument I could make is that the kernel isn'tThis makes UDL devices work on ChromeOS again after commitThis problem has been caused by userspace. Why can it not be fixed there?
c91acda3a380 ("drm/gem: Check for valid formats"). Prior to that
commit things were "working" because we'd silently treat the ARGB8888
that ChromeOS wanted as XRGB8888.
supposed to break userspace. Before the extra format validation patch,
AKA commit c91acda3a380 ("drm/gem: Check for valid formats"),
userspace worked. Now it doesn't.
That being said, one can certainly argue that userspace was working in
the past simply due to relying on a bug. ...and in such a case fixing
the bug in userspace is preferred.
I don't personally know _how_ to fix userspace but it feels like it
should be possible.
And udl is just one driver. Any other driver without ARGB8888, such asIt's the ChromeOS compositor. I can totally believe that those drivers
simpledrm or ofdrm, would be affected. Do these work?
don't work. In this case, though, those drivers aren't needed by a USB
peripheral that someone might plug in. ;-)
-Doug