Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 25/01/2024 14:11, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Currently, thermal zones associated with providers that have interrupts
> for signaling hot/critical trips are required to set a polling-delay
> of 0 to indicate no polling. This feels a bit backwards.
>
> Change the code such that "no polling delay" also means "no polling".
>
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 12 ++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
With best wishes
Dmitry