Re: [PATCH 0/2] Assume polling-delay(-passive) = 0 when absent

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 25/01/2024 13:11, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> As it stands, setting 0 explicitly feels like spam inside the DTs.
> This series simplifies it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Applied, thanks


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog