Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the loongarch tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 14:09:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   853f96367535 ("LoongArch: Add kernel livepatching support")
> 
> from the loongarch tree and commit:
> 
>   f48212ee8e78 ("treewide: remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM")
> 
> from the kvm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> index 99a0a15ce5f7,eb2139387a54..000000000000
> --- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
> @@@ -133,11 -133,8 +133,10 @@@ config LOONGARC
>   	select HAVE_KPROBES
>   	select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
>   	select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> - 	select HAVE_KVM
>  +	select HAVE_LIVEPATCH
>   	select HAVE_MOD_ARCH_SPECIFIC
>   	select HAVE_NMI
>  +	select HAVE_OBJTOOL if AS_HAS_EXPLICIT_RELOCS
>   	select HAVE_PCI
>   	select HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
>   	select HAVE_PERF_REGS

This is now a conflict between the loongarch tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpDh8feV3eUg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature