Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvmem: Remove qoriq-efuse in favor of layerscape-sfp

[richard]

On 2024-03-16 01:20, Sean Anderson wrote:
> The qoriq-efuse driver is a duplicate of layerscape-sfp.c. The T-series
> uses TA 2.0, while Layerscape uses TA 2.1 or 3.0 (depending on the
> chip). Add appropriate compatibles to the layerscape-sfp driver and
> remove the qoriq-efuse driver. I did not add support for P-series SoCs,
> since they use TA 1.0 which doesn't share a major version with either 
> of
> the existing implementations.
>
> The qoriq-efuse driver does not properly abstract the location/offset 
> of
> the fuses properly, instead exposing the device's whole address range 
> to
> userspace. This is not appropriate, as the fuses only occupy a small
> portion of this range. The layerscape-sfp module correctly constrains
> the nvmem size to the fuses size. This represents a (necessary)
> compatibility break. The qoriq-efuse driver has been in-tree for around
> six months. Hopefully this will limit the fallout.
>
> I would appreciate if someone with access to trust architecture 2.0 
> user
> guide could confirm the number of fuses.
>
> Fixes: 0861110bb421 ("nvmem: add new NXP QorIQ eFuse driver")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@xxxxxxxxx>
I don't think Fixes is appropriate here. Apart from that:

Acked-by: Richard Alpe <richard@xxxxxxxx>