Re: [PATCH 3/4] RAS: ATL: Add map_bits_valid to header

[Yazen Ghannam]

On 3/14/24 12:35, John Allen wrote:
> Make map_bits_valid available in the AMD ATL internal header as the
> function can be used in other parts of the library.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Allen <john.allen@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c   | 2 +-
>   drivers/ras/amd/atl/internal.h | 3 +++
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c
> index 4ea46262c4f5..a20cf615b83a 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c
> +++ b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/dehash.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>    * If @num_intlv_dies and/or @num_intlv_sockets are 1, it means the
>    * respective interleaving is disabled.
>    */
> -static inline bool map_bits_valid(struct addr_ctx *ctx, u8 bit1, u8 bit2,
> +inline bool map_bits_valid(struct addr_ctx *ctx, u8 bit1, u8 bit2,
>   				  u8 num_intlv_dies, u8 num_intlv_sockets)
>   {
>   	if (!(ctx->map.intlv_bit_pos == bit1 || ctx->map.intlv_bit_pos == bit2)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/internal.h b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/internal.h
> index 05b870fcb24e..4681449321de 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/amd/atl/internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/ras/amd/atl/internal.h
> @@ -239,6 +239,9 @@ unsigned long convert_umc_mca_addr_to_sys_addr(struct atl_err *err);
>   u64 add_base_and_hole(struct addr_ctx *ctx, u64 addr);
>   u64 remove_base_and_hole(struct addr_ctx *ctx, u64 addr);
>   
> +inline bool map_bits_valid(struct addr_ctx *ctx, u8 bit1, u8 bit2,
> +			   u8 num_intlv_dies, u8 num_intlv_sockets);
> +
>   /*
>    * Make a gap in @data that is @num_bits long starting at @bit_num.
>    * e.g. data		= 11111111'b

Ultimately, the maps should be validated as soon as they are gathered. I
figured we would do that later. But that would wipe out this change.
And, after looking at dehash.c again, map_bits_valid() isn't used in too
many places right now.

So I think validate_address_map() from the following patch should be
done for all modes first. That way we don't need to add and then remove
this function from the header.

Thanks,
Yazen