On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 05:00:33PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
We need a new `struct_group()` helper that allows for both having the
struct be tagged, and specifying struct attributes like `__packed`
or `__align(x)`.
This new helper will initially be used to address
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings, where a tagged struct is used
to separate the flexible-array member from the rest of the members in
the flexible structure [1]. There are some scenarios in which those
members need to be packed, as well.
So, `struct_group_tagged_attr()` is introduced for this.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/ZeIgeZ5Sb0IZTOyt@neat/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/stddef.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/stddef.h b/include/linux/stddef.h
index 929d67710cc5..919df9453257 100644
--- a/include/linux/stddef.h
+++ b/include/linux/stddef.h
@@ -80,6 +80,26 @@ enum {
#define struct_group_tagged(TAG, NAME, MEMBERS...) \
__struct_group(TAG, NAME, /* no attrs */, MEMBERS)
+/**
+ * struct_group_tagged_attr() - Create a struct_group with a reusable
+ * tag and trailing attributes.
+ *
+ * @TAG: The tag name for the named sub-struct
+ * @NAME: The identifier name of the mirrored sub-struct
+ * @ATTRS: Any struct attributes to apply
+ * @MEMBERS: The member declarations for the mirrored structs
+ *
+ * Used to create an anonymous union of two structs with identical
+ * layout and size: one anonymous and one named. The former can be
+ * used normally without sub-struct naming, and the latter can be
+ * used to reason about the start, end, and size of the group of
+ * struct members. Includes struct tag argument for the named copy,
+ * so the specified layout can be reused later. Also includes
+ * structure attributes argument.
+ */
+#define struct_group_tagged_attr(TAG, NAME, ATTRS, MEMBERS...) \
+ __struct_group(TAG, NAME, ATTRS, MEMBERS)
This is the same as __struct_group() only with a longer name? Why not
just use __struct_group() directly?