Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: dmi: Add SMBIOS/DMI support

From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Tue Mar 19 2024 - 13:14:45 EST


On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 02:55, Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Enable the dmi driver for riscv which would allow access the
> SMBIOS info through some userspace file(/sys/firmware/dmi/*).
>
> The change was based on that of arm64 and has been verified
> by dmidecode tool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>


> ---
> Changes since v1
> - Change to use memremap/memunmap for dmi_(early)_remap/unmap
> definition(suggested by Ard)
> - Minor clean up for comments (Ard)
> ---
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/dmi.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/firmware/efi/riscv-runtime.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/dmi.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> index 8ebafe337eac..3639151cb4ef 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -952,6 +952,17 @@ config EFI
> allow the kernel to be booted as an EFI application. This
> is only useful on systems that have UEFI firmware.
>
> +config DMI
> + bool "Enable support for SMBIOS (DMI) tables"
> + depends on EFI
> + default y
> + help
> + This enables SMBIOS/DMI feature for systems.
> +
> + This option is only useful on systems that have UEFI firmware.
> + However, even with this option, the resultant kernel should
> + continue to boot on existing non-UEFI platforms.
> +
> config CC_HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR_TLS
> def_bool $(cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=tls -mstack-protector-guard-reg=tp -mstack-protector-guard-offset=0)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/dmi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/dmi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ca7cce557ef7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/dmi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Intel Corporation
> + *
> + * based on arch/arm64/include/asm/dmi.h
> + *
> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
> + * License. See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
> + * for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_DMI_H
> +#define __ASM_DMI_H
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define dmi_early_remap(x, l) memremap(x, l, MEMREMAP_WB)
> +#define dmi_early_unmap(x, l) memunmap(x)
> +#define dmi_remap(x, l) memremap(x, l, MEMREMAP_WB)
> +#define dmi_unmap(x) memunmap(x)
> +#define dmi_alloc(l) kzalloc(l, GFP_KERNEL)
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/riscv-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/riscv-runtime.c
> index 09525fb5c240..c3bfb9e77e02 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/riscv-runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/riscv-runtime.c
> @@ -152,3 +152,16 @@ void arch_efi_call_virt_teardown(void)
> {
> efi_virtmap_unload();
> }
> +
> +static int __init riscv_dmi_init(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * On riscv, DMI depends on UEFI, and dmi_setup() needs to
> + * be called early because dmi_id_init(), which is an arch_initcall
> + * itself, depends on dmi_scan_machine() having been called already.
> + */
> + dmi_setup();
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +core_initcall(riscv_dmi_init);
> --
> 2.34.1
>