Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Use a smaller freq for the policy->max when verify

[Viresh Kumar]

On 19-03-24, 16:01, Xuewen Yan wrote:
> When driver use the cpufreq_frequency_table_verify() as the
> cpufreq_driver->verify's callback. It may cause the policy->max
> bigger than the freq_qos's max freq.
> 
> Just as follow:
> 
> unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0 # cat scaling_available_frequencies
> 614400 768000 988000 1228800 1469000 1586000 1690000 1833000 2002000 2093000
> 
> unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0 # echo 1900000 > scaling_max_freq
> unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0 # echo 1900000 > scaling_min_freq
> unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0 # cat scaling_max_freq
> 2002000
> unisoc:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy0 # cat scaling_min_freq
> 2002000
> 
> When user set the qos_min and qos_max as the same value, and the value
> is not in the freq-table, the above scenario will occur.
> 
> This is because in cpufreq_frequency_table_verify() func, when it can not
> find the freq in table, it will change the policy->max to be a bigger freq,
> as above, because there is no 1.9G in the freq-table, the policy->max would
> be set to 2.002G. As a result, the cpufreq_policy->max is bigger than the
> user's qos_max. This is unreasonable.
> 
> So use a smaller freq when can not find the freq in fre-table, to prevent

                                                      freq-table

> the policy->max exceed the qos's max freq.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh