Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] selftests/resctrl: Convert get_mem_bw_imc() fd close to for loop

[Reinette Chatre]

Hi Ilpo,

On 3/11/2024 6:52 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> The open() side handles fds in a for loop but close() is based on two
> fixed indexes READ and WRITE.
> 
> Match the close() side with the open() side by using for loop for
> consistency.

I find the close() side to be more appropriate. I say this for two
reasons: (a) looking at the close() calls as they are now it is
obvious what the close() applies to and transitioning to a loop
adds a layer of unnecessary indirection, (b) I do not think a loop
is appropriate for the READ/WRITE define that just happen to be 0
and 1 ... there should not be an assumption about their underlying
value.

Reinette