Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] iio: pressure: Introduce new cleanup routines to BMP280 driver *_raw() functions

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Wed Mar 20 2024 - 07:00:18 EST


On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:29:21AM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> Introduce the new linux/cleanup.h with the guard(mutex) functionality
> in the {read/write}_raw() functions

Missing period at the end of the sentence.

..

> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
> switch (chan->type) {
> case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> - ret = data->chip_info->read_humid(data, val, val2);
> - break;
> + return data->chip_info->read_humid(data, val, val2);
> case IIO_PRESSURE:
> - ret = data->chip_info->read_press(data, val, val2);
> - break;
> + return data->chip_info->read_press(data, val, val2);
> case IIO_TEMP:
> - ret = data->chip_info->read_temp(data, val, val2);
> - break;
> + return data->chip_info->read_temp(data, val, val2);
> default:
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }

> - break;
> + return 0;

Now dead code.

> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
> switch (chan->type) {
> case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> *val = 1 << data->oversampling_humid;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_PRESSURE:
> *val = 1 << data->oversampling_press;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> case IIO_TEMP:
> *val = 1 << data->oversampling_temp;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> default:
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }

> - break;
> + return 0;

Ditto.

> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> if (!data->chip_info->sampling_freq_avail) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> *val = data->chip_info->sampling_freq_avail[data->sampling_freq][0];
> *val2 = data->chip_info->sampling_freq_avail[data->sampling_freq][1];
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_LOW_PASS_FILTER_3DB_FREQUENCY:
> if (!data->chip_info->iir_filter_coeffs_avail) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> *val = (1 << data->iir_filter_coeff) - 1;
> - ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> - break;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> default:
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }

> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> + return 0;

Ditto.

..

> +
> +

One blank line is enough.

> +static int bmp280_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + int *val, int *val2, long mask)

..

> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OVERSAMPLING_RATIO:
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);
> - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> switch (chan->type) {
> case IIO_HUMIDITYRELATIVE:
> - ret = bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_humid(data, val);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_humid(data, val);
> case IIO_PRESSURE:
> - ret = bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_press(data, val);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_press(data, val);
> case IIO_TEMP:
> - ret = bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_temp(data, val);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_oversampling_ratio_temp(data, val);
> default:
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(data->dev);
> - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(data->dev);
> - break;
> + return 0;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);
> - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> - ret = bmp280_write_sampling_frequency(data, val, val2);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(data->dev);
> - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(data->dev);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_sampling_frequency(data, val, val2);
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_LOW_PASS_FILTER_3DB_FREQUENCY:
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);
> - mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> - ret = bmp280_write_iir_filter_coeffs(data, val);
> - mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(data->dev);
> - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(data->dev);
> - break;
> + return bmp280_write_iir_filter_coeffs(data, val);
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + return 0;

As per above, dead code.

..

> +static int bmp280_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + int val, int val2, long mask)
> +{
> + struct bmp280_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);

> + int ret = 0;

Useless assignment.

> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(data->dev);
> + ret = bmp280_write_raw_guarded(indio_dev, chan, val, val2, mask);
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(data->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(data->dev);
> +
> return ret;
> }

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko