Re: [PATCH] flow_dissector: prevent NULL pointer dereference in __skb_flow_dissect

[Jiri Pirko]

Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 01:04:22PM CET, abelova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>21/03/24 13:57, Jiri Pirko пишет:
>> Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:36:53AM CET, abelova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > 
>> > 20/03/24 16:38, Jiri Pirko пишет:
>> > > Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 01:56:35PM CET, abelova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > > > skb is an optional parameter, so it may be NULL.
>> > > > Add check defore dereference in eth_hdr.
>> > > > 
>> > > > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>> > > Either drop this line which provides no value, or attach a link to the
>> > > actual report.
>> > > 
>> > It is an established practice for our project. You can find 700+ applied
>> > patches with similar line:
>> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/?qt=grep&q=linuxtesting.org
>> Okay. So would it be possible to attach a link to the actual report?
>
>Unfortunately no as far as results of the SVACE static analysis tool are
>not available publicly at the moment.

So, don't mention it, has no value what so ever. No place for
advertisements like this.


>
>
>Also I agree that this is quite a minor fix, but I still insist
>that it would be better to add a check.

It is not possible (prove us wrong) to hit this bug in real world.
No point to fix nobug.


>
>> 
>> > 
>> > > > Fixes: 67a900cc0436 ("flow_dissector: introduce support for Ethernet addresses")
>> > > This looks incorrect. I believe that this is the offending commit:
>> > > commit 690e36e726d00d2528bc569809048adf61550d80
>> > > Author: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > Date:   Sat Aug 23 12:13:41 2014 -0700
>> > > 
>> > >       net: Allow raw buffers to be passed into the flow dissector.
>> > > 
>> > Got it.
>> > 
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > ---
>> > > > net/core/flow_dissector.c | 2 +-
>> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > > > 
>> > > > diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
>> > > > index 272f09251343..05db3a8aa771 100644
>> > > > --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
>> > > > +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
>> > > > @@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net,
>> > > > 		rcu_read_unlock();
>> > > > 	}
>> > > > 
>> > > > -	if (dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
>> > > > +	if (skb && dissector_uses_key(flow_dissector,
>> > > > 			       FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS)) {
>> > > > 		struct ethhdr *eth = eth_hdr(skb);
>> > > > 		struct flow_dissector_key_eth_addrs *key_eth_addrs;
>> > > Looks like FLOW_DISSECT_RET_OUT_BAD should be returned in case the
>> > > FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_ETH_ADDRS are selected and there is no skb, no?
>> > I agree, I'll send the second version.
>> > 
>> > Anastasia Belova
>> > 
>
>