Re: [PATCH v4] perf lock contention: skip traceiter functions

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 04:58:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Thanks, testing it now on x86_64 and aarch64, will apply it then.

Done, applied, on aarch64:

root@roc-rk3399-pc:~# perf lock contention --use-bpf -a find / > /dev/null
 contended   total wait     max wait     avg wait         type   caller

         6      6.03 s       6.03 s       1.00 s      spinlock   __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0xc0
        19    811.74 ms    621.76 ms     42.72 ms     spinlock   rcu_core+0xec
         2    201.76 ms    201.75 ms    100.88 ms     spinlock   sugov_update_shared+0x44
         6      7.80 ms      2.35 ms      1.30 ms        mutex   regulator_lock_recursive+0x144
         1    702.63 us    702.63 us    702.63 us      rwsem:W   __btrfs_tree_lock+0x2c
         4     62.42 us     18.96 us     15.60 us     spinlock   tick_do_update_jiffies64+0x44
         2     39.96 us     22.17 us     19.98 us     spinlock   __tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0xc0
         2     33.83 us     18.08 us     16.92 us        mutex   mmc_blk_rw_wait+0x138
         1     21.58 us     21.58 us     21.58 us     spinlock   sugov_update_shared+0x44
         1     16.92 us     16.92 us     16.92 us     spinlock   cpu_pm_enter+0x34
         1     16.04 us     16.04 us     16.04 us        mutex   clk_prepare_lock+0x4c
root@roc-rk3399-pc:~# uname -a
Linux roc-rk3399-pc 6.1.68-12200-g1c40dda3081e #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Dec 14 04:02:49 EST 2023 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
root@roc-rk3399-pc:~#

its in tmp.perf-tools-next, will move to perf-tools-next in the next batch, after build
tests together with other patches.

Thanks!

- Arnaldo