Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93

From: Frank Li
Date: Fri Mar 22 2024 - 10:32:46 EST

Next message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree"
Previous message: Manivannan Sadhasivam: "Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: owl: fix register access functions"
In reply to: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v8 4/8] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93"
Next in thread: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v8 5/8] perf: imx_perf: fix counter start and config sequence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:39:26PM +0800, Xu Yang wrote:
> This driver is initinally used to support imx93 Soc and now it's time to
> add support for imx95 Soc. However, some macro definitions and events are
> different on these two Socs. For preparing imx95 supports, this will
> refactor driver for imx93.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>

>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - new patch
> Changes in v5:
> - use is_visible to hide unwanted attributes as suggested by Will
> Changes in v6:
> - improve imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config()
> Changes in v7:
> - improve imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config() as suggested by Frank
> Changes in v8:
> - adjust is_visable() as suggested by Frank
> ---
> drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> index b728719b494c..011377c01dea 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
> @@ -11,14 +11,14 @@
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>
> /* Performance monitor configuration */
> -#define PMCFG1 0x00
> -#define PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(31)
> -#define PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(30)
> -#define PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN BIT(29)
> -#define PMCFG1_ID_MASK GENMASK(17, 0)
> +#define PMCFG1 0x00
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(31)
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN BIT(30)
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN BIT(29)
> +#define MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK GENMASK(17, 0)
>
> -#define PMCFG2 0x04
> -#define PMCFG2_ID GENMASK(17, 0)
> +#define PMCFG2 0x04
> +#define MX93_PMCFG2_ID GENMASK(17, 0)
>
> /* Global control register affects all counters and takes priority over local control registers */
> #define PMGC0 0x40
> @@ -76,6 +76,11 @@ static const struct imx_ddr_devtype_data imx93_devtype_data = {
> .identifier = "imx93",
> };
>
> +static inline bool is_imx93(struct ddr_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> + return pmu->devtype_data == &imx93_devtype_data;
> +}
> +
> static const struct of_device_id imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids[] = {
> {.compatible = "fsl,imx93-ddr-pmu", .data = &imx93_devtype_data},
> { /* sentinel */ }
> @@ -123,23 +128,36 @@ static const struct attribute_group ddr_perf_cpumask_attr_group = {
> .attrs = ddr_perf_cpumask_attrs,
> };
>
> +struct imx9_pmu_events_attr {
> + struct device_attribute attr;
> + u64 id;
> + const void *devtype_data;
> +};
> +
> static ssize_t ddr_pmu_event_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *page)
> {
> - struct perf_pmu_events_attr *pmu_attr;
> + struct imx9_pmu_events_attr *pmu_attr;
>
> - pmu_attr = container_of(attr, struct perf_pmu_events_attr, attr);
> + pmu_attr = container_of(attr, struct imx9_pmu_events_attr, attr);
> return sysfs_emit(page, "event=0x%02llx\n", pmu_attr->id);
> }
>
> #define ID(counter, id) ((counter << CONFIG_COUNTER_OFFSET) | id)
>
> -#define IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(_name, _id) \
> - (&((struct perf_pmu_events_attr[]) { \
> +#define DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_COMM(_name, _id, _data) \
> + (&((struct imx9_pmu_events_attr[]) { \
> { .attr = __ATTR(_name, 0444, ddr_pmu_event_show, NULL),\
> - .id = _id, } \
> + .id = _id, \
> + .devtype_data = _data, } \
> })[0].attr.attr)
>
> +#define IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(_name, _id) \
> + DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_COMM(_name, _id, NULL)
> +
> +#define IMX93_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(_name, _id) \
> + DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_COMM(_name, _id, &imx93_devtype_data)
> +
> static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> /* counter0 cycles event */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(cycles, 0),
> @@ -185,7 +203,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_6, ID(2, 70)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_ld_wiq_7, ID(2, 71)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_empty, ID(2, 72)),
> - IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, ID(2, 73)),
> + IMX93_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_trans_filt, ID(2, 73)), /* imx93 specific*/
>
> /* counter3 specific events */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_0, ID(3, 64)),
> @@ -197,7 +215,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_6, ID(3, 70)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_collision_7, ID(3, 71)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_full, ID(3, 72)),
> - IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, ID(3, 73)),
> + IMX93_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_wr_trans_filt, ID(3, 73)), /* imx93 specific*/
>
> /* counter4 specific events */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_0, ID(4, 64)),
> @@ -209,7 +227,7 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_6, ID(4, 70)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_row_open_7, ID(4, 71)),
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pmon_ld_rdq2_rmw, ID(4, 72)),
> - IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, ID(4, 73)),
> + IMX93_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(eddrtq_pm_rd_beat_filt, ID(4, 73)), /* imx93 specific*/
>
> /* counter5 specific events */
> IMX9_DDR_PMU_EVENT_ATTR(ddrc_qx_valid_start_0, ID(5, 64)),
> @@ -244,9 +262,29 @@ static struct attribute *ddr_perf_events_attrs[] = {
> NULL,
> };
>
> +static umode_t
> +ddr_perf_events_attrs_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct attribute *attr, int unused)
> +{
> + struct pmu *pmu = dev_get_drvdata(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
> + struct ddr_pmu *ddr_pmu = to_ddr_pmu(pmu);
> + struct imx9_pmu_events_attr *eattr;
> +
> + eattr = container_of(attr, typeof(*eattr), attr.attr);
> +
> + if (!eattr->devtype_data)
> + return attr->mode;
> +
> + if (eattr->devtype_data != ddr_pmu->devtype_data)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return attr->mode;
> +}
> +
> static const struct attribute_group ddr_perf_events_attr_group = {
> .name = "events",
> .attrs = ddr_perf_events_attrs,
> + .is_visible = ddr_perf_events_attrs_is_visible,
> };
>
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-15");
> @@ -368,36 +406,28 @@ static void ddr_perf_counter_local_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int config,
> }
> }
>
> -static void ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int event,
> - int counter, int axi_id, int axi_mask)
> +static void imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int event,
> + int counter, int axi_id, int axi_mask)
> {
> u32 pmcfg1, pmcfg2;
> + u32 mask[] = { MX93_PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN,
> + MX93_PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN,
> + MX93_PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN };
>
> pmcfg1 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG1);
>
> - if (counter == 2 && event == 73)
> - pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> - else if (counter == 2 && event != 73)
> - pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> -
> - if (counter == 3 && event == 73)
> - pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> - else if (counter == 3 && event != 73)
> - pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> -
> - if (counter == 4 && event == 73)
> - pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> - else if (counter == 4 && event != 73)
> - pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> + if (counter >= 2 && counter <= 4)
> + pmcfg1 = event == 73 ? pmcfg1 | mask[counter - 2] :
> + pmcfg1 & ~mask[counter - 2];
>
> - pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
> - pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, axi_mask);
> - writel(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
> + pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
> + pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG1_ID_MASK, axi_mask);
> + writel_relaxed(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
>
> pmcfg2 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> - pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
> - pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, axi_id);
> - writel(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> + pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
> + pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(MX93_PMCFG2_ID, axi_id);
> + writel_relaxed(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> }
>
> static void ddr_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> @@ -513,7 +543,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags);
>
> /* read trans, write trans, read beat */
> - ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, event_id, counter, cfg1, cfg2);
> + imx93_ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, event_id, counter, cfg1, cfg2);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Next message: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree"
Previous message: Manivannan Sadhasivam: "Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: owl: fix register access functions"
In reply to: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v8 4/8] perf: imx_perf: refactor driver for imx93"
Next in thread: Xu Yang: "[PATCH v8 5/8] perf: imx_perf: fix counter start and config sequence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]