Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] mlx5 ConnectX control misc driver
From: Aron Silverton
Date: Fri Mar 22 2024 - 10:54:08 EST
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 09:23:28PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/4/24 9:02 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 01:57:35PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> >> I also like this, I don't want the outcome of this discussion to be
> >> that only mlx5ctl gets merged. I want all the HW that has this problem
> >> to have support in the mainline kernel.
> >
> > To this end here is my proposal to move forward with a new
> > mini-subsystem to provide rules for this common approach. Get the
> > existing tools out of hacky unstructured direct hardware access via
> > /sys/XX and into a formalized lockdown compatible system. I've talked
> > to enough people now to think we have a critical mass.
> >
>
> It has been almost 3 weeks and no response (to this and other proposals
> in this thread). I have been around Linux long enough to know that
> silence is not acceptance.
>
> To me, this seems like a sane start for a new subsystem addressing
> challenges with complex, modern devices. To that end:
>
> Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
+1. We look forward to helping with the development and testing
in any way that we can.
Jason, thank you for creating this proposal and apologies for not
responding on-list sooner.
Aron