Re: [PATCH net] ice: Fix freeing uninitialized pointers
From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Fri Mar 22 2024 - 11:03:51 EST
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 03:24:56 -0400 (EDT) Julia Lawall wrote:
> > At present I find this construct unreadable.
> > I may get used to it, hard to say.
> >
> > Also I don't see the benefit of the auto-freeing construct,
> > I'd venture a guess that all the bugs it may prevent would
> > have been caught by smatch. But I'm an old curmudgeon stuck
> > in my ways. Feel free to experiment in Intel drivers, and we'll
> > see how it works out 🤷️
>
> In my experiments with of_node_put, there seem to be many functions where
> removing the frees makes the function much more readable. But
> kmalloc/kfree may be used in different contexts, where the management of
> the memory is a smaller percentage of the overall code. So the tradeoffs
> may be different.
Good point! References are likely a very good use case for this sort
of thing. The act of bumping a counter lacks the feeling of lifetime
we get with an object :(