Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 support for hibernation

[Marc Zyngier]

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:17:58 +0000,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 12:41 -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 05:14:42PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 08:27 -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > > > If we're going down the route of having this PSCI call live in KVM, it
> > > > really deserves a test. I think you can just pile on the existing
> > > > psci_test selftest.
> > > 
> > > Added to
> > > https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/psci-hibernate
> > > for next time.
> > > 
> > > From 8c72a78e6179bc8970edc66a85ab6bee26f581fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:07:46 +0000
> > > Subject: [PATCH 4/8] KVM: selftests: Add test for PSCI SYSTEM_OFF2
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Looks good, thanks!
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Marc, I think I've also addressed your feedback? Is there anything else
> to do other than wait for the spec to be published?

Other than the couple of minor nits I mentioned in replies to the
individual patches, this looks good to me.

> Shall I post a v4 with PSCI v1.3 as default and the self-test? Would
> you apply that into a branch ready for merging when the spec is ready,
> or should I just wait and repost it all then?

I think this can wait for the final spec. I assume that you are
directly tracking this anyway, so we don't need to poll for the spec
update.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.