Re: [PATCH] riscv: Improve sbi_ecall() code generation by reordering arguments

From: Atish Patra
Date: Fri Mar 22 2024 - 15:05:46 EST


On 3/22/24 04:26, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
The sbi_ecall() function arguments are not in the same order as the
ecall arguments, so we end up re-ordering the registers before the
ecall which is useless and costly.

So simply reorder the arguments in the same way as expected by ecall.
Instead of reordering directly the arguments of sbi_ecall(), use a proxy
macro since the current ordering is more natural.

Before:

Dump of assembler code for function sbi_ecall:
0xffffffff800085e0 <+0>: add sp,sp,-32
0xffffffff800085e2 <+2>: sd s0,24(sp)
0xffffffff800085e4 <+4>: mv t1,a0
0xffffffff800085e6 <+6>: add s0,sp,32
0xffffffff800085e8 <+8>: mv t3,a1
0xffffffff800085ea <+10>: mv a0,a2
0xffffffff800085ec <+12>: mv a1,a3
0xffffffff800085ee <+14>: mv a2,a4
0xffffffff800085f0 <+16>: mv a3,a5
0xffffffff800085f2 <+18>: mv a4,a6
0xffffffff800085f4 <+20>: mv a5,a7
0xffffffff800085f6 <+22>: mv a6,t3
0xffffffff800085f8 <+24>: mv a7,t1
0xffffffff800085fa <+26>: ecall
0xffffffff800085fe <+30>: ld s0,24(sp)
0xffffffff80008600 <+32>: add sp,sp,32
0xffffffff80008602 <+34>: ret

After:

Dump of assembler code for function __sbi_ecall:
0xffffffff8000b6b2 <+0>: add sp,sp,-32
0xffffffff8000b6b4 <+2>: sd s0,24(sp)
0xffffffff8000b6b6 <+4>: add s0,sp,32
0xffffffff8000b6b8 <+6>: ecall
0xffffffff8000b6bc <+10>: ld s0,24(sp)
0xffffffff8000b6be <+12>: add sp,sp,32
0xffffffff8000b6c0 <+14>: ret


Nice!

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 10 ++++++----
arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
index 6e68f8dff76b..9041b009d3b5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
@@ -292,10 +292,12 @@ struct sbiret {
};
void sbi_init(void);
-struct sbiret sbi_ecall(int ext, int fid, unsigned long arg0,
- unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2,
- unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4,
- unsigned long arg5);
+struct sbiret __sbi_ecall(unsigned long arg0, unsigned long arg1,
+ unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
+ unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5,
+ int fid, int ext);
+#define sbi_ecall(e, f, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5) \
+ __sbi_ecall(a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, f, e)
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SBI_V01
void sbi_console_putchar(int ch);
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
index e66e0999a800..5719fa03c3d1 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sbi.c
@@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ static int (*__sbi_rfence)(int fid, const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5) __ro_after_init;
-struct sbiret sbi_ecall(int ext, int fid, unsigned long arg0,
- unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2,
- unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4,
- unsigned long arg5)
+struct sbiret __sbi_ecall(unsigned long arg0, unsigned long arg1,
+ unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
+ unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5,
+ int fid, int ext)
{
struct sbiret ret;
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct sbiret sbi_ecall(int ext, int fid, unsigned long arg0,
return ret;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(sbi_ecall);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sbi_ecall);
int sbi_err_map_linux_errno(int err)
{

Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>