Re: [PATCH] selftests/mm: Confirm VA exhaustion without reliance on correctness of mmap()
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Mar 22 2024 - 15:19:20 EST
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:42:47 +0530 Dev Jain <dev.jain@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 3/22/24 03:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:05:22 +0530 Dev Jain <dev.jain@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Currently, VA exhaustion is being checked by passing a hint to mmap() and
> >> expecting it to fail. This patch makes a stricter test by successful write()
> >> calls from /proc/self/maps to a dump file, confirming that a free chunk is
> >> indeed not available.
> > What's wrong with the current approach?
> While populating the lower VA space, mmap() fails because we have
> exhausted the space.
>
> Then, in validate_lower_address_hint(), because mmap() fails, we confirm
> that we have
>
> indeed exhausted the space. There is a circular logic involved here.
>
> Assume that there is a bug in mmap(), also assume that it exists
> independent of whether
>
> you pass a hint address or not; that for some reason it is not able to
> find a 1GB chunk.
>
> My idea is to assert the exhaustion against some other method.
Thanks. I added the above to the changelog.
>
> Also, in the following line in validate_complete_va_space():
>
> if (start_addr - prev_end_addr >= SZ_1GB)
>
> I made a small error, I forgot to use MAP_CHUNK_SIZE instead of SZ_1GB.
And the preceding comment might need an edit. Please send an updated
patch?