Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Fix race in read_extent_buffer_pages()

From: David Sterba
Date: Fri Mar 22 2024 - 15:28:34 EST


On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 09:14:29PM -0400, Tavian Barnes wrote:
> To prevent concurrent reads for the same extent buffer,
> read_extent_buffer_pages() performs these checks:
>
> /* (1) */
> if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags))
> return 0;
>
> /* (2) */
> if (test_and_set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags))
> goto done;
>
> At this point, it seems safe to start the actual read operation. Once
> that completes, end_bbio_meta_read() does
>
> /* (3) */
> set_extent_buffer_uptodate(eb);
>
> /* (4) */
> clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags);
>
> Normally, this is enough to ensure only one read happens, and all other
> callers wait for it to finish before returning. Unfortunately, there is
> a racey interleaving:
>
> Thread A | Thread B | Thread C
> ---------+----------+---------
> (1) | |
> | (1) |
> (2) | |
> (3) | |
> (4) | |
> | (2) |
> | | (1)
>
> When this happens, thread B kicks of an unnecessary read. Worse, thread
> C will see UPTODATE set and return immediately, while the read from
> thread B is still in progress. This race could result in tree-checker
> errors like this as the extent buffer is concurrently modified:
>
> BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupted node, root=256
> block=8550954455682405139 owner mismatch, have 11858205567642294356
> expect [256, 18446744073709551360]
>
> Fix it by testing UPTODATE again after setting the READING bit, and if
> it's been set, skip the unnecessary read.
>
> Fixes: d7172f52e993 ("btrfs: use per-buffer locking for extent_buffer reading")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAHk-=whNdMaN9ntZ47XRKP6DBes2E5w7fi-0U3H2+PS18p+Pzw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/f51a6d5d7432455a6a858d51b49ecac183e0bbc9.1706312914.git.wqu@xxxxxxxx/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c7241ea4-fcc6-48d2-98c8-b5ea790d6c89@xxxxxxx/
> Signed-off-by: Tavian Barnes <tavianator@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you very much for taking the time to debug the issue and for the
fix. It is a rare occurrence that a tough bug is followed by a fix from
the same person (outside of the developer group) and is certainly
appreciated.