On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 01:09:57PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Hello,Friendly ping :)
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 12:32:33PM +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 07.03.24 um 23:07 schrieb Johannes Weiner:Shashank pointed out to me in private that byte access would indeed be
Lastly I went with an open loop instead of a memcpy() as I wasn't
sure if that memory is safe to address a byte at at time.
safe. However, after actually trying it it won't work because memcpy()
doesn't play nice with mqd being volatile:
/home/hannes/src/linux/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c: In function 'amdgpu_debugfs_mqd_read':
/home/hannes/src/linux/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.c:550:22: warning: passing argument 1 of '__builtin_dynamic_object_size' discards 'volatil' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
550 | memcpy(kbuf, mqd, ring->mqd_size);
So I would propose leaving the patch as-is. Shashank, does that sound
good to you?
Shashank, is your Reviewed-by still good for this patch, given the
above?
Thanks