[PATCH 6.7 107/713] lib/cmdline: Fix an invalid format specifier in an assertion msg

From: Sasha Levin
Date: Mon Mar 25 2024 - 06:42:59 EST


From: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit d2733a026fc7247ba42d7a8e1b737cf14bf1df21 ]

The correct format specifier for p - n (both p and n are pointers) is
%td, as the type should be ptrdiff_t.

This was discovered by annotating KUnit assertion macros with gcc's
printf specifier, but note that gcc incorrectly suggested a %d or %ld
specifier (depending on the pointer size of the architecture being
built).

Fixes: 0ea09083116d ("lib/cmdline: Allow get_options() to take 0 to validate the input")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/cmdline_kunit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c
index d4572dbc91453..705b82736be08 100644
--- a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void cmdline_do_one_range_test(struct kunit *test, const char *in,
n, e[0], r[0]);

p = memchr_inv(&r[1], 0, sizeof(r) - sizeof(r[0]));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, NULL, "in test %u at %u out of bound", n, p - r);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, NULL, "in test %u at %td out of bound", n, p - r);
}

static void cmdline_test_range(struct kunit *test)
--
2.43.0