[PATCH v4 0/2] swiotlb: allocate padding slots if necessary

[Petr Tesarik]

From: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

If the allocation alignment is bigger than IO_TLB_SIZE and min_align_mask
covers some bits in the original address between IO_TLB_SIZE and
alloc_align_mask, preserve these bits by allocating additional padding
slots before the actual swiotlb buffer.

Changes from v3
---------------
* Add a parameter to swiotlb_align_offset(), so it is not open-coded in
  swiotlb_tbl_map_single().
* Extend the description of swiotlb_align_offset() and convert it to the
  kernel-doc format.
* Use bit operations to calculate number of padding slots and the padding
  inside a slot. This matches all other such calculations in swiotlb.c.

Changes from v2
---------------
* Fix assignment of an uninitialized variable to pad_slots.
* Improve commit message wrt INVALID_PHYS_ADDR.

Changes from v1
---------------
* Rename padding to pad_slots.
* Set pad_slots only for the first allocated non-padding slot.
* Do not bother initializing orig_addr to INVALID_PHYS_ADDR.
* Change list and pad_slots to unsigned short to avoid growing
  struct io_tlb_slot on 32-bit targets.
* Add build-time check that list and pad_slots can hold the maximum
  allowed value of IO_TLB_SEGSIZE.


Petr Tesarik (2):
  swiotlb: extend buffer pre-padding to alloc_align_mask if necessary
  bug: introduce ASSERT_VAR_CAN_HOLD()

 include/linux/build_bug.h | 10 +++++++
 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c      | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1