RE: [PATCH v19 037/130] KVM: TDX: Make KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS backend specific

[Huang, Kai]

> > Here, "verified", I think Kai wanted to emphasize that the value of
> > max_vcpus passed in via KVM_TDX_INIT_VM should be checked against the
> > value configured via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS?
> >
> > Maybe "verified and used" ?
> 
> Ok. I don't have strong opinion here.

It depends on how you implement that patch.  

If we don't pass 'max_vcpus' in that patch, there's nothing to verify really.