[PATCH 0/2] regressions documentation improvements

[Karel Balej]

Hello,

this small series suggests two (hopefully) improvements for the
regressions-related documentation texts.

The first one is perhaps unnecessarily nitpicky but if nothing else, it
at least adds a missing word.

The other one tries to clarify for future readers a question which was
on my mind through the whole process during my first attempt at
reporting a regression.

Please take a look, I am eager to hear what you think.

Thank you, kind regards,
K. B.

Karel Balej (2):
  docs: *-regressions.rst: unify quoting, add missing word
  docs: handling-regressions.rst: clarify that "Closes:" tags work too

 .../admin-guide/reporting-regressions.rst     | 10 +++---
 .../process/handling-regressions.rst          | 32 ++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

-- 
2.44.0