[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 61/75] btrfs: handle chunk tree lookup error in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()

[Sasha Levin]

From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 7411055db5ce64f836aaffd422396af0075fdc99 ]

The unhandled case in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks() loop is a corruption,
as it could be caused only by two impossible conditions:

- at first the search key is set up to look for a chunk tree item, with
  offset -1, this is an inexact search and the key->offset will contain
  the correct offset upon a successful search, a valid chunk tree item
  cannot have an offset -1

- after first successful search, the found_key corresponds to a chunk
  item, the offset is decremented by 1 before the next loop, it's
  impossible to find a chunk item there due to alignment and size
  constraints

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 12 +++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 722a1dde75636..18b12cc4df68a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -3352,7 +3352,17 @@ static int btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 			mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
 			goto error;
 		}
-		BUG_ON(ret == 0); /* Corruption */
+		if (ret == 0) {
+			/*
+			 * On the first search we would find chunk tree with
+			 * offset -1, which is not possible. On subsequent
+			 * loops this would find an existing item on an invalid
+			 * offset (one less than the previous one, wrong
+			 * alignment and size).
+			 */
+			ret = -EUCLEAN;
+			goto error;
+		}
 
 		ret = btrfs_previous_item(chunk_root, path, key.objectid,
 					  key.type);
-- 
2.43.0