Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] In-place module initialisation

[Miguel Ojeda]

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 1:11 PM Valentin Obst <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think the idea in [1] was to have this patch being included in the
> stable trees. I got little experience with stable trees but wouldn't the
> easiest way be that you add:
>
>         Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.8.x: 715dd8950d4e rust: phy: implement `Send` for `Registration`
>         Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         Fixes: 247b365dc8dc ("rust: add `kernel` crate")
>
> in the sign-off section for this patch? (Or mark the first one for stable
> inclusion as well, [2] has more information on that).

715dd8950d4e is your local hash for 1/5, right? So I would drop the
hash, because it may be confusing.

It may be possible to remove the first line (since 1/5 will only apply
to 6.8.x and it is already the previous patch in the series, while the
`Fixes` tag here may make it clear that 2/5 should still go everywhere
regardless of 1/5), but I guess it does not hurt to be extra clear.

What about:

    Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.8.x: rust: phy: implement `Send`
for `Registration`
    Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.1+
    Fixes: 247b365dc8dc ("rust: add `kernel` crate")

Cheers,
Miguel