Re: [PATCH 1/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move temperature reading out of update loop

[Sebastian Reichel]

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:31:24 -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
> Most of the functions that read values return a status and put the value
> itself in an a function parameter. Update temperature reading to match.
> 
> As temp is not checked for changes as part of the update loop, remove
> the read of the temperature from the periodic update loop. This saves
> I2C/1W bandwidth. It also means we do not have to cache it, fresh
> values are read when requested.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move temperature reading out of update loop
      commit: c32c617de8076d8fb2a16a4a2f3b5da5f3df398d
[2/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move time reading out of update loop
      commit: 651a620aa4d49f5647e21e55fc71bb049bc03389
[3/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move charge reading out of update loop
      commit: 8d846335204f25a2247e5e88e39e1604b6ecc133
[4/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move energy reading out of update loop
      commit: 39cf1c4cd03254218a23ef955bd534e19328f618
[5/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move cycle count reading out of update loop
      commit: 656489ac90f25f92190a1dd5c4e5c5293bd70323
[6/6] power: supply: bq27xxx: Move health reading out of update loop
      commit: 50f0ff7c8cc4c1d10fabc4b3b3f3b9e942b08187

Best regards,
-- 
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>