[syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in sched_tick

From: syzbot
Date: Mon Apr 01 2024 - 15:44:48 EST

Next message: David Lechner: "Re: [PATCH 6/6] iio: adc: ad7173: Add support for AD411x devices"
Previous message: Nikita Kiryushin: "[PATCH v3] rcu: Fix buffer overlow in print_cpu_stall_info()"
Next in thread: Jakub Sitnicki: "Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in sched_tick"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: a6bd6c933339 Add linux-next specific files for 20240328
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=152c42c5180000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=b0058bda1436e073
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a1d7495c905fa16bea17
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/7c1618ff7d25/disk-a6bd6c93.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/875519f620fe/vmlinux-a6bd6c93.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ad92b057fb96/bzImage-a6bd6c93.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+a1d7495c905fa16bea17@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

=====================================================
WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
6.9.0-rc1-next-20240328-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.4/5791 [HC0[0]:SC0[2]:HE0:SE0] is trying to acquire:
ffff88807672ec68 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
ffff88807672ec68 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939

and this task is already holding:
ffff8880b943e698 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2a/0x140 kernel/sched/core.c:559
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}

but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}

.. which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
_raw_spin_lock_nested+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:378
raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2a/0x140 kernel/sched/core.c:559
raw_spin_rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1397 [inline]
rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1711 [inline]
sched_tick+0xa1/0x6e0 kernel/sched/core.c:5679
update_process_times+0x202/0x230 kernel/time/timer.c:2491
tick_periodic+0x190/0x220 kernel/time/tick-common.c:100
tick_handle_periodic+0x4a/0x160 kernel/time/tick-common.c:112
timer_interrupt+0x5c/0x70 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:57
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x29c/0xa80 kernel/irq/handle.c:158
handle_irq_event_percpu kernel/irq/handle.c:193 [inline]
handle_irq_event+0x89/0x1f0 kernel/irq/handle.c:210
handle_level_irq+0x3c5/0x6e0 kernel/irq/chip.c:648
generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:161 [inline]
handle_irq arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:238 [inline]
__common_interrupt+0x13a/0x230 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:257
common_interrupt+0xa5/0xd0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247
asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:693
__raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:152 [inline]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xd8/0x140 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194
__setup_irq+0x1335/0x1e20 kernel/irq/manage.c:1823
request_threaded_irq+0x2ab/0x380 kernel/irq/manage.c:2207
request_irq include/linux/interrupt.h:171 [inline]
setup_default_timer_irq+0x25/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:70
x86_late_time_init+0x66/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:94
start_kernel+0x3f3/0x500 init/main.c:1042
x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:507
x86_64_start_kernel+0x99/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:488
common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147

to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
(&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2}

.. which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
..
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_update_common+0x20c/0xa30 net/core/sock_map.c:1007
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x5a4/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:581
map_update_elem+0x53a/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0x76f/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5619
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&rq->__lock);
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rq->__lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor.4/5791:
#0: ffff8880b943e698 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2a/0x140 kernel/sched/core.c:559
#1: ffffffff8e334d60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_lock_acquire include/linux/rcupdate.h:329 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e334d60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: rcu_read_lock include/linux/rcupdate.h:781 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e334d60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2395 [inline]
#1: ffffffff8e334d60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: bpf_trace_run4+0x244/0x580 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2439

the dependencies between HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:
-> (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2} {
IN-HARDIRQ-W at:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
_raw_spin_lock_nested+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:378
raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2a/0x140 kernel/sched/core.c:559
raw_spin_rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1397 [inline]
rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1711 [inline]
sched_tick+0xa1/0x6e0 kernel/sched/core.c:5679
update_process_times+0x202/0x230 kernel/time/timer.c:2491
tick_periodic+0x190/0x220 kernel/time/tick-common.c:100
tick_handle_periodic+0x4a/0x160 kernel/time/tick-common.c:112
timer_interrupt+0x5c/0x70 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:57
__handle_irq_event_percpu+0x29c/0xa80 kernel/irq/handle.c:158
handle_irq_event_percpu kernel/irq/handle.c:193 [inline]
handle_irq_event+0x89/0x1f0 kernel/irq/handle.c:210
handle_level_irq+0x3c5/0x6e0 kernel/irq/chip.c:648
generic_handle_irq_desc include/linux/irqdesc.h:161 [inline]
handle_irq arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:238 [inline]
__common_interrupt+0x13a/0x230 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:257
common_interrupt+0xa5/0xd0 arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:247
asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:693
__raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:152 [inline]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xd8/0x140 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194
__setup_irq+0x1335/0x1e20 kernel/irq/manage.c:1823
request_threaded_irq+0x2ab/0x380 kernel/irq/manage.c:2207
request_irq include/linux/interrupt.h:171 [inline]
setup_default_timer_irq+0x25/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:70
x86_late_time_init+0x66/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:94
start_kernel+0x3f3/0x500 init/main.c:1042
x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:507
x86_64_start_kernel+0x99/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:488
common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147
IN-SOFTIRQ-W at:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
_raw_spin_lock_nested+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:378
raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2a/0x140 kernel/sched/core.c:559
raw_spin_rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1397 [inline]
rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1711 [inline]
ttwu_queue kernel/sched/core.c:4055 [inline]
try_to_wake_up+0x7d3/0x1470 kernel/sched/core.c:4378
call_timer_fn+0x18e/0x650 kernel/time/timer.c:1793
expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1844 [inline]
__run_timers kernel/time/timer.c:2418 [inline]
__run_timer_base+0x66a/0x8e0 kernel/time/timer.c:2429
run_timer_base kernel/time/timer.c:2438 [inline]
run_timer_softirq+0xb7/0x170 kernel/time/timer.c:2448
__do_softirq+0x2c6/0x980 kernel/softirq.c:554
invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:428 [inline]
__irq_exit_rcu+0xf2/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:633
irq_exit_rcu+0x9/0x30 kernel/softirq.c:645
instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043 [inline]
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa6/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1043
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702
native_safe_halt arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:48 [inline]
arch_safe_halt arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:86 [inline]
default_idle+0x13/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:742
default_idle_call+0x74/0xb0 kernel/sched/idle.c:117
cpuidle_idle_call kernel/sched/idle.c:191 [inline]
do_idle+0x22f/0x5d0 kernel/sched/idle.c:332
cpu_startup_entry+0x42/0x60 kernel/sched/idle.c:430
rest_init+0x2dc/0x300 init/main.c:738
start_kernel+0x47a/0x500 init/main.c:1080
x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:507
x86_64_start_kernel+0x99/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:488
common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
_raw_spin_lock_nested+0x31/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:378
raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x2a/0x140 kernel/sched/core.c:559
raw_spin_rq_lock kernel/sched/sched.h:1397 [inline]
_raw_spin_rq_lock_irqsave kernel/sched/sched.h:1416 [inline]
rq_lock_irqsave kernel/sched/sched.h:1695 [inline]
rq_attach_root+0xee/0x540 kernel/sched/topology.c:494
sched_init+0x64e/0xc30 kernel/sched/core.c:10041
start_kernel+0x1ab/0x500 init/main.c:951
x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x30 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:507
x86_64_start_kernel+0x99/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:488
common_startup_64+0x13e/0x147
}
... key at: [<ffffffff92930080>] sched_init.__key+0x0/0x20

the dependencies between the lock to be acquired
and HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
-> (&htab->buckets[i].lock){+...}-{2:2} {
HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_update_common+0x20c/0xa30 net/core/sock_map.c:1007
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x5a4/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:581
map_update_elem+0x53a/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0x76f/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5619
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_update_common+0x20c/0xa30 net/core/sock_map.c:1007
sock_map_update_elem_sys+0x5a4/0x910 net/core/sock_map.c:581
map_update_elem+0x53a/0x6f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1641
__sys_bpf+0x76f/0x810 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5619
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5738 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5736
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
}
... key at: [<ffffffff94aee2e0>] sock_hash_alloc.__key+0x0/0x20
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939
bpf_prog_2c29ac5cdc6b1842+0x42/0x46
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1233 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:667 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:674 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2396 [inline]
bpf_trace_run4+0x334/0x580 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2439
__traceiter_sched_switch+0x98/0xd0 include/trace/events/sched.h:222
trace_sched_switch include/trace/events/sched.h:222 [inline]
__schedule+0x2587/0x4a50 kernel/sched/core.c:6743
preempt_schedule_common+0x84/0xd0 kernel/sched/core.c:6925
preempt_schedule+0xe1/0xf0 kernel/sched/core.c:6949
preempt_schedule_thunk+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S:12
class_preempt_destructor include/linux/preempt.h:480 [inline]
try_to_wake_up+0x9a8/0x1470 kernel/sched/core.c:4385
wake_up_process kernel/sched/core.c:4510 [inline]
wake_up_q+0xc8/0x120 kernel/sched/core.c:1029
futex_wake+0x523/0x5c0 kernel/futex/waitwake.c:199
do_futex+0x392/0x560 kernel/futex/syscalls.c:107
__do_sys_futex kernel/futex/syscalls.c:179 [inline]
__se_sys_futex+0x3f9/0x480 kernel/futex/syscalls.c:160
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 5791 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc1-next-20240328-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/27/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
print_bad_irq_dependency kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2626 [inline]
check_irq_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2865 [inline]
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3138 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x4dc7/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178
spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline]
sock_hash_delete_elem+0xb0/0x300 net/core/sock_map.c:939
bpf_prog_2c29ac5cdc6b1842+0x42/0x46
bpf_dispatcher_nop_func include/linux/bpf.h:1233 [inline]
__bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:667 [inline]
bpf_prog_run include/linux/filter.h:674 [inline]
__bpf_trace_run kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2396 [inline]
bpf_trace_run4+0x334/0x580 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:2439
__traceiter_sched_switch+0x98/0xd0 include/trace/events/sched.h:222
trace_sched_switch include/trace/events/sched.h:222 [inline]
__schedule+0x2587/0x4a50 kernel/sched/core.c:6743
preempt_schedule_common+0x84/0xd0 kernel/sched/core.c:6925
preempt_schedule+0xe1/0xf0 kernel/sched/core.c:6949
preempt_schedule_thunk+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S:12
class_preempt_destructor include/linux/preempt.h:480 [inline]
try_to_wake_up+0x9a8/0x1470 kernel/sched/core.c:4385
wake_up_process kernel/sched/core.c:4510 [inline]
wake_up_q+0xc8/0x120 kernel/sched/core.c:1029
futex_wake+0x523/0x5c0 kernel/futex/waitwake.c:199
do_futex+0x392/0x560 kernel/futex/syscalls.c:107
__do_sys_futex kernel/futex/syscalls.c:179 [inline]
__se_sys_futex+0x3f9/0x480 kernel/futex/syscalls.c:160
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6d/0x75
RIP: 0033:0x7fbc0887dda9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fbc09678178 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000ca
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fbc089abf88 RCX: 00007fbc0887dda9
RDX: 00000000000f4240 RSI: 0000000000000081 RDI: 00007fbc089abf8c
RBP: 00007fbc089abf80 R08: 00007fbc096790b0 R09: 00007fbc096786c0
R10: 0000000000000005 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fbc089abf8c
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007ffc30232610 R15: 00007ffc302326f8
</TASK>

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Next message: David Lechner: "Re: [PATCH 6/6] iio: adc: ad7173: Add support for AD411x devices"
Previous message: Nikita Kiryushin: "[PATCH v3] rcu: Fix buffer overlow in print_cpu_stall_info()"
Next in thread: Jakub Sitnicki: "Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] possible deadlock in sched_tick"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]