Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fold intel_pstate_max_within_limits() into caller
From: srinivas pandruvada
Date: Mon Apr 01 2024 - 16:06:56 EST
On Mon, 2024-03-25 at 18:01 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fold intel_pstate_max_within_limits() into its only caller.
>
> No functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 13 ++++---------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -2012,14 +2012,6 @@ static void intel_pstate_set_min_pstate(
> intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, cpu->pstate.min_pstate);
> }
>
> -static void intel_pstate_max_within_limits(struct cpudata *cpu)
> -{
> - int pstate = max(cpu->pstate.min_pstate, cpu-
> >max_perf_ratio);
> -
> - update_turbo_state();
> - intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, pstate);
> -}
> -
> static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(struct cpudata *cpu)
> {
> int perf_ctl_max_phys = pstate_funcs.get_max_physical(cpu-
> >cpu);
> @@ -2594,12 +2586,15 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struc
> intel_pstate_update_perf_limits(cpu, policy->min, policy-
> >max);
>
> if (cpu->policy == CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE) {
> + int pstate = max(cpu->pstate.min_pstate, cpu-
> >max_perf_ratio);
> +
> /*
> * NOHZ_FULL CPUs need this as the governor callback
> may not
> * be invoked on them.
> */
> intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
> - intel_pstate_max_within_limits(cpu);
> + update_turbo_state();
> + intel_pstate_set_pstate(cpu, pstate);
> } else {
> intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
> }
>
>
>