Re: [PATCH v1 02/16] serial: max3100: Update uart_driver_registered on driver removal

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 01:18:27PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> On Tue,  2 Apr 2024 18:38:08 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

..

> >  	pr_debug("removing max3100 driver\n");
> >  	uart_unregister_driver(&max3100_uart_driver);
> > +	uart_driver_registered = 0;
> 
> At the beginning of the probe function, we have:
> 
> -----------------------
> if (!uart_driver_registered) {
> 		uart_driver_registered = 1;
> 		retval = uart_register_driver(&max3100_uart_driver);
> 		if (retval) {
> 			printk(KERN_ERR "Couldn't register max3100 uart
> driver\n"); mutex_unlock(&max3100s_lock);
> 			return retval;
> ...
> -----------------------
> 
> If uart_register_driver() fails, uart_driver_registered would still be
> true and would it prevent any other subsequent devices from being
> properly registered? If yes, then maybe "uart_driver_registered = 1"
> should be set only after a sucessfull call to uart_register_driver()?

Looks like yet another issue here (however I haven't hit it so far).
I guess I can combine both fixes.  What do you think?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko