Re: [PATCH] perf lock contention: Add a missing NULL check

From: Ian Rogers
Date: Tue Apr 02 2024 - 14:49:51 EST


On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 11:45 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I got a report for a failure in BPF verifier on a recent kernel with
> perf lock contention command. It checks task->sighand->siglock without
> checking if sighand is NULL or not. Let's add one.
>
> ; if (&curr->sighand->siglock == (void *)lock)
> 265: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r0 +2624) ; frame1: R0_w=trusted_ptr_task_struct(off=0,imm=0) R1_w=rcu_ptr_or_null_sighand_struct(off=0,imm=0)
> 266: (b7) r2 = 0 ; frame1: R2_w=0
> 267: (0f) r1 += r2
> R1 pointer arithmetic on rcu_ptr_or_null_ prohibited, null-check it first
> processed 164 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 1 total_states 15 peak_states 15 mark_read 5
> -- END PROG LOAD LOG --
> libbpf: prog 'contention_end': failed to load: -13
> libbpf: failed to load object 'lock_contention_bpf'
> libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'lock_contention_bpf': -13
> Failed to load lock-contention BPF skeleton
> lock contention BPF setup failed
> lock contention did not detect any lock contention
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Ian

> ---
> tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
> index fb54bd38e7d0..4e5914d7eeaa 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static inline __u32 check_lock_type(__u64 lock, __u32 flags)
> break;
> case LCB_F_SPIN: /* spinlock */
> curr = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
> - if (&curr->sighand->siglock == (void *)lock)
> + if (curr->sighand && &curr->sighand->siglock == (void *)lock)
> return LCD_F_SIGHAND_LOCK;
> break;
> default:
> --
> 2.44.0.478.gd926399ef9-goog
>