Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Make reader optimistic spinning optional
From: John Stultz
Date: Tue Apr 02 2024 - 21:28:02 EST
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 6:21 PM Bongkyu Kim <bongkyu7.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:46:06PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 6:07 PM Bongkyu Kim <bongkyu7.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is rework of the following discussed patch.
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613043308.GA1027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > Changes from the previous patch
> > > - Split to revert and modify patches
> > > - Change according to Waiman Long's review
> > > More wording to documentation part
> > > Change module_param to early_param
> > > Code change by Waiman Long's suggestion
> > >
> > > In mobile environment, reader optimistic spinning is still useful
> > > because there're not many readers. In my test result at android device,
> > > it improves application startup time about 3.8%
> > > App startup time is most important factor for android user expriences.
> > > So, re-enable reader optimistic spinning by this commit. And,
> > > make it optional feature by cmdline.
> > >
> > > Test result:
> > > This is 15 application startup performance in our exynos soc.
> > > - Cortex A78*2 + Cortex A55*6
> > > - unit: ms (lower is better)
> > >
> > > Application base opt_rspin Diff Diff(%)
> > > -------------------- ------ --------- ---- -------
> > > * Total(geomean) 343 330 -13 +3.8%
> > > -------------------- ------ --------- ---- -------
> > > helloworld 110 108 -2 +1.8%
> > > Amazon_Seller 397 388 -9 +2.3%
> > > Whatsapp 311 304 -7 +2.3%
> > > Simple_PDF_Reader 500 463 -37 +7.4%
> > > FaceApp 330 317 -13 +3.9%
> > > Timestamp_Camera_Free 451 443 -8 +1.8%
> > > Kindle 629 597 -32 +5.1%
> > > Coinbase 243 233 -10 +4.1%
> > > Firefox 425 399 -26 +6.1%
> > > Candy_Crush_Soda 552 538 -14 +2.5%
> > > Hill_Climb_Racing 245 230 -15 +6.1%
> > > Call_Recorder 437 426 -11 +2.5%
> > > Color_Fill_3D 190 180 -10 +5.3%
> > > eToro 512 505 -7 +1.4%
> > > GroupMe 281 266 -15 +5.3%
> > >
> >
> > Hey Bongkyu,
> > I wanted to reach out to see what the current status of this patch
> > set? I'm seeing other parties trying to work around the loss of the
> > optimistic spinning functionality since commit 617f3ef95177
> > ("locking/rwsem: Remove reader optimistic spinning") as well, with
> > their own custom variants (providing some substantial gains), and
> > would really like to have a common solution.
> >
>
> I didn't get an reply, so I've been waiting.
> Could you let me know about their patch?
I don't have insight/access to any other implementations, but I have
nudged folks to test your patch and chime in here.
Mostly I just wanted to share that others are also seeing performance
trouble from the loss of optimistic spinning, so it would be good to
get some sort of shared solution upstream.
thanks
-john