RE: [PATCH v5 1/1] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add StarFive JH8100 support

From: ChunHau Tan
Date: Wed Apr 03 2024 - 06:32:26 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, 29 March, 2024 4:42 AM
> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: ChunHau Tan <chunhau.tan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David S . Miller
> <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub
> Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; Emil Renner
> Berthing <kernel@xxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx>; Alexandre Torgue
> <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bartosz
> Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Halaney
> <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>; Uwe
> Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Russell King
> <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Leyfoon Tan <leyfoon.tan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> JeeHeng Sia <jeeheng.sia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add
> StarFive JH8100 support
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 08:54:30AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 27/03/2024 02:57, Tan Chun Hau wrote:
> > > Add StarFive JH8100 dwmac support.
> > > The JH8100 dwmac shares the same driver code as the JH7110 dwmac and
> > > has only one reset signal.
> > >
> > > Please refer to below:
> > >
> > > JH8100: reset-names = "stmmaceth";
> > > JH7110: reset-names = "stmmaceth", "ahb";
> > > JH7100: reset-names = "ahb";
> > >
> > > Example usage of JH8100 in the device tree:
> > >
> > > gmac0: ethernet@16030000 {
> > > compatible = "starfive,jh8100-dwmac",
> > > "starfive,jh7110-dwmac",
> > > "snps,dwmac-5.20";
> > > ...
> > > };
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tan Chun Hau <chunhau.tan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 1 +
> > > .../bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++----
> > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > > index 6b0341a8e0ea..a6d596b7dcf4 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
> > > @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ properties:
> > > - snps,dwxgmac-2.10
> > > - starfive,jh7100-dwmac
> > > - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> > > + - starfive,jh8100-dwmac
> >
> > I think that's not needed. You have there already your fallback.

Okay, I will remove it.

> >
> > >
> > > reg:
> > > minItems: 1
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
> > > index 0d1962980f57..5805a58c55d1 100644
> > > ---
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.ya
> > > +++ ml
> > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ select:
> > > enum:
> > > - starfive,jh7100-dwmac
> > > - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> > > + - starfive,jh8100-dwmac
> >
> > Same here, even more obvious.
>
> Agreed.

Okay, I will remove it.
>
> >
> > > required:
> > > - compatible
> > >
> > > @@ -30,6 +31,10 @@ properties:
> > > - items:
> > > - const: starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> > > - const: snps,dwmac-5.20
> > > + - items:
> > > + - const: starfive,jh8100-dwmac
> > > + - const: starfive,jh7110-dwmac
> > > + - const: snps,dwmac-5.20
> > >
> > > reg:
> > > maxItems: 1
> > > @@ -116,11 +121,25 @@ allOf:
> > > minItems: 3
> > > maxItems: 3
> > >
> > > - resets:
> > > - minItems: 2
> > > -
> > > - reset-names:
> > > - minItems: 2
> > > + if:
> >
> > I would personally avoid nesting if within if. It gets unreadable.
> > Although Rob did not comment on this one, so I guess it is fine.
>
> I normally agree, but here I suggested it as it looked to be the simplest option.
>
> With the 2 other comments addressed,
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>