Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] dt-bindings: interconnect: Add Qualcomm IPQ9574 support
From: Varadarajan Narayanan
Date: Wed Apr 03 2024 - 06:45:44 EST
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:09:15AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/04/2024 12:34, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_NSSCC 10
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_SNOC_0 11
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_SNOC_1 12
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_PCNOC_1 13
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_QOSGEN_REF 14
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_TIMEOUT_REF 15
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_XO_DCD 16
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_ATB 17
> > +#define ICC_MEM_NOC_NSSNOC 18
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_MEMNOC 19
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_MEM_NOC_1 20
> > +
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_PPE 0
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_PPE_CFG 1
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_NSS_CSR 2
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_IMEM_QSB 3
> > +#define ICC_NSSNOC_IMEM_AHB 4
> > +
> > +#define MASTER(x) ((ICC_ ## x) * 2)
> > +#define SLAVE(x) (MASTER(x) + 1)
>
> You already received comment to make your bindings consistent with other
> Qualcomm bindings. Now you repeat the same mistake.
>
> No, that is neither consistent nor greppble.
Sorry. Have restored the naming and posted v7.
Kindly take a look.
Thanks
Varada