Re: [PATCH v6 05/16] dt-bindings: net: wireless: describe the ath12k PCI module

From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Date: Wed Apr 03 2024 - 10:56:33 EST


On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 3:01 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> IMHO it would be better to have just driver maintainers listed here.
>

Why? What's wrong with having the author of the bindings in the Cc list?

> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - vddaon-supply
> > + - vddwlcx-supply
> > + - vddwlmx-supply
> > + - vddrfacmn-supply
> > + - vddrfa0p8-supply
> > + - vddrfa1p2-supply
> > + - vddrfa1p8-supply
> > + - vddpcie0p9-supply
> > + - vddpcie1p8-supply
>
> Same comment here as in patch 4. There are also ath12k PCI devices which
> don't need DT at all. I don't know if that should be reflected in the
> bindings doc but I want to point out this.
>

But DT bindings don't apply to devices that don't have DT nodes. This
isn't an issue at all.

Bart