Re: [PATCH v19 111/130] KVM: TDX: Implement callbacks for MSR operations for TDX
From: Sean Christopherson
Date: Wed Apr 03 2024 - 11:17:31 EST
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index 389bb95d2af0..c8f991b69720 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -1877,6 +1877,76 @@ void tdx_get_exit_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 *reason,
> *error_code = 0;
> }
>
> +static bool tdx_is_emulated_kvm_msr(u32 index, bool write)
> +{
> + switch (index) {
> + case MSR_KVM_POLL_CONTROL:
> + return true;
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +bool tdx_has_emulated_msr(u32 index, bool write)
> +{
> + switch (index) {
> + case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
> + case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
> + case MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL:
> + case MSR_IA32_CR_PAT:
> + case MSR_IA32_TSC_DEADLINE:
> + case MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE:
> + case MSR_PLATFORM_INFO:
> + case MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES:
> + case MSR_IA32_MCG_CAP:
> + case MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS:
> + case MSR_IA32_MCG_CTL:
> + case MSR_IA32_MCG_EXT_CTL:
> + case MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL ... MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL(KVM_MAX_MCE_BANKS) - 1:
> + case MSR_IA32_MC0_CTL2 ... MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(KVM_MAX_MCE_BANKS) - 1:
> + /* MSR_IA32_MCx_{CTL, STATUS, ADDR, MISC, CTL2} */
> + return true;
> + case APIC_BASE_MSR ... APIC_BASE_MSR + 0xff:
> + /*
> + * x2APIC registers that are virtualized by the CPU can't be
> + * emulated, KVM doesn't have access to the virtual APIC page.
> + */
> + switch (index) {
> + case X2APIC_MSR(APIC_TASKPRI):
> + case X2APIC_MSR(APIC_PROCPRI):
> + case X2APIC_MSR(APIC_EOI):
> + case X2APIC_MSR(APIC_ISR) ... X2APIC_MSR(APIC_ISR + APIC_ISR_NR):
> + case X2APIC_MSR(APIC_TMR) ... X2APIC_MSR(APIC_TMR + APIC_ISR_NR):
> + case X2APIC_MSR(APIC_IRR) ... X2APIC_MSR(APIC_IRR + APIC_ISR_NR):
> + return false;
> + default:
> + return true;
> + }
> + case MSR_IA32_APICBASE:
> + case MSR_EFER:
> + return !write;
Meh, for literally two MSRs, just open code them in tdx_set_msr() and drop the
@write param. Or alternatively add:
static bool tdx_is_read_only_msr(u32 msr){
{
return msr == MSR_IA32_APICBASE || msr == MSR_EFER;
}
> + case 0x4b564d00 ... 0x4b564dff:
This is silly, just do
case MSR_KVM_POLL_CONTROL:
return false;
and let everything else go through the default statement, no?
> + /* KVM custom MSRs */
> + return tdx_is_emulated_kvm_msr(index, write);
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +int tdx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
> +{
> + if (tdx_has_emulated_msr(msr->index, false))
> + return kvm_get_msr_common(vcpu, msr);
> + return 1;
Please invert these and make the happy path the not-taken path, i.e.
if (!tdx_has_emulated_msr(msr->index))
return 1;
return kvm_get_msr_common(vcpu, msr);
The standard kernel pattern is
if (error)
return <error thingie>
return <happy thingie>
> +}
> +
> +int tdx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
> +{
> + if (tdx_has_emulated_msr(msr->index, true))
As above:
if (tdx_is_read_only_msr(msr->index))
return 1;
if (!tdx_has_emulated_msr(msr->index))
return 1;
return kvm_set_msr_common(vcpu, msr);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index d5b18cad9dcd..0e1d3853eeb4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,6 @@
> #include "trace.h"
>
> #define MAX_IO_MSRS 256
> -#define KVM_MAX_MCE_BANKS 32
>
> struct kvm_caps kvm_caps __read_mostly = {
> .supported_mce_cap = MCG_CTL_P | MCG_SER_P,
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index 4e40c23d66ed..c87b7a777b67 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #include "kvm_cache_regs.h"
> #include "kvm_emulate.h"
>
> +#define KVM_MAX_MCE_BANKS 32
Split this to a separate. Yes, it's trivial, but that's _exactly_ why it should
be in a separate patch. The more trivial refactoring you split out, the more we
can apply _now_ and take off your hands.