Re: [PATCH v0 01/14] IB/hfi1, IB/qib: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

[Dennis Dalessandro]

On 4/3/24 4:30 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:25PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's series
>> to fix drivers/i2c[1], fix the terminology where I had a role to play, now that
>> the approved verbiage exists in the specification.
>>
>> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.c           |  6 ++--
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip.h           |  2 +-
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/chip_registers.h |  2 +-
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/file_ops.c       |  2 +-
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/firmware.c       | 22 ++++++-------
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/pcie.c           |  2 +-
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/qsfp.c           | 36 ++++++++++-----------
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_exp_rcv.c   |  2 +-
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_twsi.c        |  6 ++--
>>  9 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> hfi1 and qib work perfectly fine with the current terminology. There is
> no need to change old code just for the sake of change.
> 
> Let's drop this patch.

Agreed.