Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/mm/pae: Align up pteval_t, pmdval_t and pudval_t to avoid split locks

[Dave Hansen]

On 4/3/24 08:54, Javier Pello wrote:
> - The third way would be to disable split lock detection on x86-32.
> This can be as simple as setting the default to "none" in
> sld_state_setup(). Not the most elegant of solutions, but beats
> having unresponsive tasks.
> 
> Would going for the first one be worth the trouble?

No, it's not worth it.  Let's just disable split lock detection on
32-bit and move on with life.