[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 11/20] thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent

[Sasha Levin]

From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 488164006a281986d95abbc4b26e340c19c4c85b ]

Currently, thermal zones associated with providers that have interrupts
for signaling hot/critical trips are required to set a polling-delay
of 0 to indicate no polling. This feels a bit backwards.

Change the code such that "no polling delay" also means "no polling".

Suggested-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240125-topic-thermal-v1-2-3c9d4dced138@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
index 1e0655b63259f..d5174f11b91c2 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c
@@ -225,14 +225,18 @@ static int thermal_of_monitor_init(struct device_node *np, int *delay, int *pdel
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay-passive", pdelay);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay-passive property\n", np);
+	if (ret == -EINVAL) {
+		*pdelay = 0;
+	} else if (ret < 0) {
+		pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay-passive: %d\n", np, ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
 	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "polling-delay", delay);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		pr_err("%pOFn: missing polling-delay property\n", np);
+	if (ret == -EINVAL) {
+		*delay = 0;
+	} else if (ret < 0) {
+		pr_err("%pOFn: Couldn't get polling-delay: %d\n", np, ret);
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.0