Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf annotate: Initialize 'arch' variable not to trip some -Werror=maybe-uninitialized

From: Ian Rogers
Date: Wed Apr 03 2024 - 18:02:08 EST


On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:03 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 09:01:56AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 8:16 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > In some older distros the build is failing due to
> > > -Werror=maybe-uninitialized, in this case we know that this isn't the
> > > case because 'arch' gets initialized by evsel__get_arch(), so just init
> > > it to NULL to silence those cases.
> > >
> > > E.g.:
> > >
> > > 32 17.12 opensuse:15.5 : FAIL gcc version 7.5.0 (SUSE Linux)
> > > util/annotate.c: In function 'hist_entry__get_data_type':
> > > util/annotate.c:2269:15: error: 'arch' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > > struct arch *arch;
> > > ^~~~
> > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > >
> > > 43 7.30 ubuntu:18.04-x-powerpc64el : FAIL gcc version 7.5.0 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04)
> > > util/annotate.c: In function 'hist_entry__get_data_type':
> > > util/annotate.c:2351:36: error: 'arch' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> > > if (map__dso(ms->map)->kernel && arch__is(arch, "x86") &&
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > >
> > > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This looks fine but I couldn't line up the errors with code in the
> > tree. I was curious why the "maybe-uninitialized" was failing. Perhaps
> > evsel__get_arch should set the out argument to NULL when an error
> > occurs. This fix is also good but may potentially need repeating for
> > other evsel__get_arch cases, so a fix in evsel__get_arch may be
> > preferable.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Yeah, your suggestion is better and I just tested, satisfies the
> compilers that were emitting this warning.
>
> I stamped a:
>
> Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> and kept your Reviewed-by, ok?

Sure :-)

Thanks,
Ian

> - Arnaldo