Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] thermal: gov_step_wise: Simplify checks related to passive trips

[Lukasz Luba]

On 4/3/24 19:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Make it more clear from the code flow that the passive polling status
> updates only take place for passive trip points.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c |   14 ++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c
> @@ -92,15 +92,13 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(str
>   		if (instance->initialized && old_target == instance->target)
>   			continue;
>   
> -		if (old_target == THERMAL_NO_TARGET &&
> -		    instance->target != THERMAL_NO_TARGET) {
> -			/* Activate a passive thermal instance */
> -			if (trip->type == THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE)
> +		if (trip->type == THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE) {
> +			/* If needed, update the status of passive polling. */
> +			if (old_target == THERMAL_NO_TARGET &&
> +			    instance->target != THERMAL_NO_TARGET)
>   				tz->passive++;
> -		} else if (old_target != THERMAL_NO_TARGET &&
> -			   instance->target == THERMAL_NO_TARGET) {
> -			/* Deactivate a passive thermal instance */
> -			if (trip->type == THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE)
> +			else if (old_target != THERMAL_NO_TARGET &&
> +				 instance->target == THERMAL_NO_TARGET)
>   				tz->passive--;
>   		}
>   

The patch looks good, although I got some warning while applying with
my b4 tool:
BADSIG: DKIM/rjwysocki.net

Anyway, it looks like false warning IMO.

Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>