Re: [PATCH RFC cmpxchg 8/8] riscv: Emulate one-byte and two-byte cmpxchg

From: Palmer Dabbelt
Date: Thu Apr 04 2024 - 10:16:45 EST


On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 14:39:50 PDT (-0700), paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Use the new cmpxchg_emu_u8() and cmpxchg_emu_u16() to emulate one-byte
and two-byte cmpxchg() on riscv.

[ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback. ]

I'm not entirely following the thread, but sounds like there's going to be generic kernel users of this now? Before we'd said "no" to the byte/half atomic emulation routines beacuse they weren't used, but if it's a generic thing then I'm find adding them.

There's a patch set over here <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240103163203.72768-2-leobras@xxxxxxxxxx/> that implements these more directly using LR/SC. I was sort of on the fence about just taking it even with no direct users right now, as the byte/half atomic extension is working its way through the spec process so we'll have them for real soon. I stopped right there for the last merge window, though, as I figured it was too late to be messing with the atomics...

So

Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

if you guys want to take some sort of tree-wide change to make the byte/half stuff be required everywhere. We'll eventually end up with arch routines for the extension, so at that point we might as well also have the more direct LR/SC flavors.

If you want I can go review/merge that RISC-V patch set and then it'll have time to bake for a shared tag you can pick up for all this stuff? No rush on my end, just LMK.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
index be09c8836d56b..4eaf40d0a52ec 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ config RISCV
select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN
select ARCH_HAS_VDSO_DATA
select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK if ACPI
+ select ARCH_NEED_CMPXCHG_1_2_EMU
select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT
select ARCH_STACKWALK
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index 2fee65cc84432..a5b377481785c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/bug.h>

#include <asm/fence.h>
+#include <linux/cmpxchg-emu.h>

#define __xchg_relaxed(ptr, new, size) \
({ \
@@ -170,6 +171,12 @@
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
register unsigned int __rc; \
switch (size) { \
+ case 1: \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_emu_u8((volatile u8 *)__ptr, __old, __new); \
+ break; \
+ case 2: \
+ break; \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_emu_u16((volatile u16 *)__ptr, __old, __new); \
case 4: \
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
"0: lr.w %0, %2\n" \
@@ -214,6 +221,12 @@
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
register unsigned int __rc; \
switch (size) { \
+ case 1: \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_emu_u8((volatile u8 *)__ptr, __old, __new); \
+ break; \
+ case 2: \
+ break; \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_emu_u16((volatile u16 *)__ptr, __old, __new); \
case 4: \
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
"0: lr.w %0, %2\n" \
@@ -260,6 +273,12 @@
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
register unsigned int __rc; \
switch (size) { \
+ case 1: \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_emu_u8((volatile u8 *)__ptr, __old, __new); \
+ break; \
+ case 2: \
+ break; \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_emu_u16((volatile u16 *)__ptr, __old, __new); \
case 4: \
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER \
@@ -306,6 +325,12 @@
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __ret; \
register unsigned int __rc; \
switch (size) { \
+ case 1: \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_emu_u8((volatile u8 *)__ptr, __old, __new); \
+ break; \
+ case 2: \
+ break; \
+ __ret = cmpxchg_emu_u16((volatile u16 *)__ptr, __old, __new); \
case 4: \
__asm__ __volatile__ ( \
"0: lr.w %0, %2\n" \