Re: [PATCH] perf: arm_cspmu: Don't touch interrupt registers if no interrupt was assigned

[Ilkka Koskinen]

Hi,

Could someone take a look at this patch and give some feedback?

Cheers, Ilkka

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> The driver enabled and disabled interrupts even if no interrupt was
> assigned to the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index 50b89b989ce7..2cbdb5dcb6ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -795,7 +795,8 @@ static void arm_cspmu_enable_counter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, int idx)
> 	inten_off = PMINTENSET + (4 * reg_id);
> 	cnten_off = PMCNTENSET + (4 * reg_id);
>
> -	writel(BIT(reg_bit), cspmu->base0 + inten_off);
> +	if (cspmu->irq)
> +		writel(BIT(reg_bit), cspmu->base0 + inten_off);
> 	writel(BIT(reg_bit), cspmu->base0 + cnten_off);
> }
>
> @@ -810,7 +811,8 @@ static void arm_cspmu_disable_counter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu, int idx)
> 	cnten_off = PMCNTENCLR + (4 * reg_id);
>
> 	writel(BIT(reg_bit), cspmu->base0 + cnten_off);
> -	writel(BIT(reg_bit), cspmu->base0 + inten_off);
> +	if (cspmu->irq)
> +		writel(BIT(reg_bit), cspmu->base0 + inten_off);
> }
>
> static void arm_cspmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> --
> 2.40.1