Re: [PATCH 2/4] iio: temperature: ltc2983: convert to dev_err_probe()

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Andy,

On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 03:18:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 01:06:24PM +0200, Nuno Sa wrote:
> > Use dev_err_probe() in the probe() path. While at it, made some simple
> > improvements:
> >  * Declare a struct device *dev helper. This also makes the style more
> >    consistent (some places the helper was used and not in other places);
> >  * Explicitly included the err.h and errno.h headers;
> >  * Removed an useless else if();
> >  * Removed some unnecessary line breaks.
> 
> ...
> 
> >  	if (!(thermo->sensor_config & LTC2983_THERMOCOUPLE_DIFF_MASK) &&
> > -	    sensor->chan < LTC2983_DIFFERENTIAL_CHAN_MIN) {
> 
> It's better if you leave {} when the body goes after a single line.
> This applies to your entire series.

I think checkpatch complains if you leave the {...} and,
honestly, I'm not a big fan of the {...}. Unless there is a last
minute rule I missed.

If checkpatch doesn't complain, I'm OK with both ways, though.

Andi