Re: [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Jiri,

On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:37 AM Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 08. 04. 24, 7:32, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 08. 04. 24, 7:29, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> Many maintainers won't drop Cc: tags if they are there in the submitted
> >> patch. So I agree with Andy that we should encourage folks not to add
> >> them in the first place.
> >
> > But fix the docs first.
> >
> > I am personally not biased to any variant (as in: I don't care where CCs
> > live in a patch).
>
> OTOH, as a submitter, it's a major PITA to carry CCs in notes (to have
> those under the --- line). Esp. when I have patches in a queue for years.

(Good to discover I'm not the only one carrying Very Old Patches ;-)

> How do people handle that? (Like rebases on current kernel.)

Keep them under the --- line in the actual commits, just like your
changelog? All of that is retained when rebasing.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68korg

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds