Re: [PATCH 05/64] i2c: aspeed: reword according to newest specification

[Wolfram Sang]

> > -static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> > +static int aspeed_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> >  				  struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
> 
> here the alignment goes a bi off.

Thanks, I missed this.

> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE)
> >  /* precondition: bus.lock has been acquired. */
> > -static void __aspeed_i2c_reg_slave(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u16 slave_addr)
> > +static void __aspeed_i2c_reg_target(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u16 slave_addr)
> 
> We  have the word master/slave forgotten here and there, but as
> we are here, /slave_addr/target_addr/

I can do this now. My plan was to convert it when I convert the whole
CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE interface. But "since we are here" can be argued.

> >  static const struct i2c_algorithm aspeed_i2c_algo = {
> > -	.master_xfer	= aspeed_i2c_master_xfer,
> > +	.xfer	= aspeed_i2c_xfer,
> 
> here the alignment goes a bit off.

I also wanted to fix this afterwards together with all the tab-indented
struct declarations in busses/. But maybe I better do the tab-removal
series beforehand? Would you accept such a thing?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature